Environmental Impacts of New TZ Bridge are Slighter for Tarrytown Side of the River
Unlike South Nyack, which stands to lose some acres, homes and parkland, Tarrytown might sacrifice an unused .05 acre parcial in the Quay Condominiums.
The Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) released this week on the proposed Tappan Zee Hudson River Crossing Project details a much bigger impact on one area of South Nyack than it will have here in Tarrytown.
On our side of the river, there is no property displacement. Unlike the 6.09 acres – including six homes, one vacant lot, one green space and one park that stand to be eaten up in Rockland County – the land at stake in Westchester County is a .05 acre partial of vacant area in the southwest corner of the 11.3 property of the Quay Condominium community, located riverside at 279 South Broadway.
The loss of this partial will require no mitigation associated with any displacement and only a negligible reduction in property tax revenues, according to the findings. In both the long and short span bridge proposals which are still up for debate, the highway would be elevated over this sliver of property, as shown on the attached image.
You can read the entire, if lengthy, document here, which compiles figures on traffic, air quality, noise, accidents (numbering approximately 2,000 from Jan. 2008 – Dec. 2010), community, and much more which we will continue to explore in future articles, leading up to the Westchester hearing at the beginning of March.
Facilities at the current base of the bridge in Tarrytown – the toll plaza, maintenance building, and headquarters for State Troopers (Troop T) are to be moved within the same general vicinity and therefore are not considered to have substantial impact on the land use.
The proposed connector extension of the RiverWalk is to remain unaffected, as it will traverse under the bridge.
It's that mass transit void that still burns, as has been the outcry of many a public official, including Mayor Drew Fixell who said previously, “The absence of mass transit is a serious deficiency in the proposal that needs to be corrected. It is a missed opportunity.”
According to the study, the replacement bridge would "substantially enhance incident management, responses to accidents, and resultant vehicle delays," along with bolstering bus transit safety and usage. "At the same time, the Replacement Bridge Alternative would not preclude future bus rapid transit or commuter rail service at the Tappan Zee Hudson River crossing, but such a proposal would be subject to a separate environmental review and approval process at the time that it is foreseeable and financing is available."
Today Mayor Fixell objected to the depiction of the impact as only slight: "I wouldn't characterize the proposal as only having minor impact even though there is only the small taking of property in the Quay.
"Impacts do go well beyond the issue of whether land is actually condemned... There will be significant impacts on the Quay even though only a small amount of land will be taken," Fixell said. "The residents of the Quay have been extremely concerned about this throughout the 10 years the project has been under consideration... I doubt that their concerns have been adequately addressed."
Public hearing information for the DEIS of the TZ Hudson Crossing Project, Westchester:
Thursday, March 1, 2012
Westchester Marriott
Grand Ballroom
670 White Plains Road
Tarrytown, New York 10591
4 - 9:00 p.m. (project presentations repeated at 5 and 7 p.m.)
Adrian Berezowsky
12:23 pm on Thursday, January 26, 2012
Krista, while I hate to disagree with you, I cannot agree with your article, especially the title. There is nothing "slight" about the impacts to Tarrytown. The only things that can or should be said is that a flawed environmental review process found that there would be only slight impacts and that there will only be a small amount of displacement. The truth, however, is that this document has not even remotely adequately addressed potential impacts nor provided a reason behind the numerous decisions which have been made.
Krista Madsen
1:13 pm on Thursday, January 26, 2012
Hi Adrian, I agree with your criticism and added "slighter" to the headline to replace slight, though that wasn't my take on it but that of the report which seemed to find our impacts here pretty minor (comparatively).
Krista Madsen
1:14 pm on Thursday, January 26, 2012
Just got a comment from the Mayor expressing the same concerns, by the way.
Adrian Berezowsky
2:35 pm on Thursday, January 26, 2012
Which Mayor?
Krista Madsen
2:39 pm on Thursday, January 26, 2012
It's the quote from TTown Mayor Fixell in article.
Adrian Berezowsky
2:54 pm on Thursday, January 26, 2012
Oops. sorry!
davideac
10:10 am on Friday, January 27, 2012
The residents near the bridge are most affected by air pollution. I wonder how strongly this has really been considered by residents and the government:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203733504577024000381790904.html
Building a new bridge north of the existing one increases visual impacts, noise, and air pollution for the greatest number of people in Tarrytown and in Sleepy Hollow.
The construction impacts will not be minor, especially for those living closer to the bridge.
Mass transit should be designed into the project explicitly, even if it must be built in a later construction phase. The assertion that the proposed bridge will not preclude the later addition of mass transit is meaningless unless the actual design of the mass transit system is known.
We shouldn't lose sight of the long-term goal of having a good regional transportation system -- like the subway system or Metro-North. Even if your pockets are empty, you should still put on your glasses before you walk down the street.
waterboy
6:10 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012
Residents residing near the bridge will NEVER SLEEP while construction is taking place...better rest up now!