Few Answers, More Questions at School Budget Hearing
Parents continued to express discontent with the proposed TUFSD budget cuts at the March 18 public hearing.
With less than a month until the budget needs to be adopted, nearly 200 concerned parents and residents attended Thursday night's Union Free District of the Tarrytown's public hearing at John Paulding.
At the start of the session, board president Mimi Godwin acknowledged the air of concern and tension in the room.
"We've received numerous letters on the budget, the cuts and the school closure," she said. "We will take everything you say under advisement."
Superintendent Howard Smith's presentation that followed reiterated the formerly announced hot button issues, including a hike in property tax across both towns and class size increase.
Smith cautioned that reconsidering the budget might mean compromising personal ideals, especially in terms of class size and walking distance.
"The real issue is getting at the standard that drives the expense," he said.
He also reminded the audience that the budget called for a cut in approximately 5 percent of the total district workforce, or 27 people.
"There's no way to cut back without laying off people," he said. "We don't take that lightly."
Then, the superintendent introduced a new twist—he asked audience members to divide into 26 groups of seven strangers, address the following three questions and come to a mutual consensus:
- Should Tappan Hill be closed as called for in the proposed budget?
- Should the district's class size guidelines be increased and Teacher Assistant support ratios be decreased as called for in the proposed budget?
- If the budget needed to be reduced further, what additional cost cutting measures should be explored?
To guide discussion of the third question, Smith provided a list of possible cuts that included elementary and secondary band, orchestra and chorus; Middle and High School summer school; bus monitors; full-day for kindergarteners (1/2 day was proposed as an alternative) and sports programs.
There were varying levels of enthusiasm about the group discussion, which were expressed in the general comment portion of the hearing.
Parent David Hodgson, the first to address the board, garnered significant applause from the audience.
"I have a general impression that a number of things [we discussed] are the same questions…administration is a huge budget. We didn't see that on the list. I would like to reiterate that there's got to be more choices," he said.
Michelle Gonzalez, a Sleepy Hollow parent of an eighth grader, agreed, citing the "$200,00 salary of the assistant superintendent."
"We're all adults here; we're ready to do what needs to be done. We have to make the cuts," she added to applause.
A few other parents also expressed their concern with the administrative salaries, but Smith continued to reply, "We just can't do certain things," pointing to employee contracts that have yet to expire.
Jeanne Naughton-Carr, a Tarrytown resident and mother of a fifth and eighth-grader, suggested a different cut.
"I think the [elementary] dual language program is a luxury," she said. "The board should seriously consider eliminating that program."
Sleepy Hollow resident Gina Lamparella, whose children have yet to enter the program, disagreed.
"I've heard students not in the dual language program suffer in their Spanish education," she said.
Overall, it did not appear audience members could come to any sort of true consensus, although a few did seem to warm to the idea of closing Tappan Hill. Some parents expressed that they would prefer to keep buses and teaching assistants over keeping the school open.
Smith argued that closing the school would save the district $670,000; and the cuts involved would not include teachers, teaching assistants and programs for students.
Sleepy Hollow resident David Rudofsky has a 5-year old son poised to enter first grade in the fall.
"I don't think this is something Dr. Smith would recommend if it wasn't workable," he said during the group discussions.
The board members collected sheets from each group to review for new ideas and invited email requests from audience members who has been unable to adequately express their ideas during the hearing.
There will be a general budget discussion open to the public on Saturday, March 20th.
The budget will be formally adopted by the Board of Education on Thursday, April 15th.
Residents of Tarrytown and Sleepy Hollow will be able to vote on the proposed budget, as well as nominated board members, on Tuesday, May 18th.
Gina Lamparella
5:14 pm on Friday, March 19, 2010
I am pictured in this article with a subtitle saying I disagreed with a comment about eliminating the dual language program, and that is simply not what I said. I stated that the students not in the dual language program get sub-par Spanish language education and I think the entire Spanish program in the elementary schools should be overhauled so that all students get a good education in Spanish. (As a matter of fact, one way to do this would be to eliminate the dual language program, and redistribute the resources we already have) This is my first experience with the Tarrytown-Sleepy Hollow Patch, and I encourage anything that is written here (even in quotation marks) be taken with a grain of salt.
Gina Lamparella
5:38 pm on Saturday, March 20, 2010
I'd like to add that both the author and editor have contacted me since I added the above comment, and the caption on the photo has been changed. Thank you for that.
Sean Roach
9:20 pm on Friday, March 19, 2010
Gina -
Thanks for stopping by and commenting! Here at the Tarrytown-Sleepy Hollow Patch we take our journalistic integrity very seriously and always look into incidents where individuals feel they have been misquoted. I am looking into your concerns and will respond to you personally tomorrow.
Thanks for making concerns known, I look forward to meeting you in person.
Sean Roach, Editor.
Gayle Millstein
10:02 pm on Friday, March 19, 2010
I attended the meeting till the bitter end and disagree that anyone felt warm to the idea of closing Tappan Hill. In fact, I felt there was a clear division between elementary parents and parents of MS/HS. Our group could not come to consensus on the issue because some felt so very strongly that Tappan Hill should stay open and other options be explored.
Sean Roach
10:08 pm on Friday, March 19, 2010
Gayle, would you say that there was a division between the parents MS/HS and elementary parents on the closure of Tappan Hill? Or on measures to make cuts?
Burt
7:54 am on Thursday, March 24, 2011
http://pearlriver.patch.com/articles/pearl-river-teachers-administrators-agree-to-reduction-in-salary-increases.
Congratulations to Pearl River's teachers and administrators!!!