patching...
Poll: Vote on your favorite rainy day recreation in the region. »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!
Local Voices
Ask Croton Energy

Should the New Tappan Zee Bridge Have Public Transit?

We all know driving creates pollution. The latest proposal to fast-track a new Tappan Zee Bridge does not include funding for any new public transit on the new crossing.

Below, we take simple look at the impact on local air quality of NOT putting more people into public transit.

The New York State Department of Transportation reports that annual trips across the TZB have been rising steadily in recent years, reaching 134,947 AADT (two way Average Annual Daily Traffic) for 2010. This volume makes the TZB the third busiest bridge in the entire state.

Let’s ignore where a driver will start or end her commute over the Tappan Zee Bridge. Let’s just examine what pollution occurs during the drive over span of the bridge alone.

Over the course of 250 annual roundtrips, each solo commuter passing over the 3.03 mile bridge span itself will emit one half metric ton of carbon dioxide equivalent exhaust (1164 pounds or 0.53 metric tons of CO2e).

This emission assumes a fuel efficiency of 25 miles per gallon per car, which is above average for passenger vehicles on the road today.

If that commuter rides a bus instead over the bridge, her commute’s contribution to local air pollution drops 93% to three-tenths of a metric ton of carbon dioxide equivalent exhaust (75 pounds or 0.03 metric tons of CO2e).

The dramatically lower emission for public transit assumes 55 passengers on a diesel bus that gets 6.0 miles per gallon.

So, in short, if you ride Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) over the new TZB all year– instead of driving yourself–you will lower your annual pollution contribution by 1,088 pounds just for the bridge’s 3 miles.

For every added mile you can switch from solo car to bus, you save another 360 pounds. If you ride the bus from a commuter lot in Nyack to Tarrytown’s MTA station, about 6 miles, you would cut your personal contribution to local air pollution by 2,178 pounds per year.

Robin Urban Smith at StreetFilms has a good short, new video on why we need BRT on the TZB. 

For more why Bus Rapid Transit makes good sense for a new Tappan Zee Bridge, see, a public information effort spearheaded by Kate Slevin and the Tri-State Transportation Campaign

SHOULD THE NEW TAPPAN ZEE HAVE PUBLIC TRANSIT? TELL US BY CLICKING ON THE "COMMENT" BUTTON.

nicholas pastore

12:20 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION IS NOT NECESSARY. FIRST OF ALL IT WOULD NOT BE SELF SURVIVAL AND THE BURDEN WOULD BE ON THE TAXPAPERS AS THE MTA IS. THERE IS NOT ENOUGH PEOPLE OTHER THAN COMMUTERS THAT WOULD RIDE IT. THE REALITY IS THAT MOST PEOPLE PREFER TO DRIVE THEM SELVES AND A PERFECT EXAMPLE ARE THE NEW YORK -LONG ISLAND BRIDGES WITH ALL OF THE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION AVAILABLE AND THE 13.00 TOLLS THE BRIDGES ARE STILL JAMMED ALL OF THE TIME. SO WAKE UP AND THE BEST THING THAT THEY COULD DO IS REPAIR THE PRESENT BRIDGE AND STOP WASTING ALL OF OUR MONEY ON STUDIES. I TRAVEL THE BRIDGE EVERY DAY AND THE ONLY PROBLEMS ARE THE ACCESS ROADS TO AND FROM THE BRIDGE THEY CAUSE THE DELAYS AND NOT THE BRIDGE.WE ARE SPENDING MILLIONS ON REPAVING THE BRIDGE NOW IS THAT GOING TO WASTE.OTHER THAN COMMUTING THE BUSES OR TRAINS WOULD BE EMPTY. WAKE UP

Reply

BigBaldDripper

12:44 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012

Just wanted to share this with everyone so you can see who each Town Council member appointed:

http://www.town.clarkstown.ny.us/html/news.asp?id=285

Reply

Don Bartolo

2:38 pm on Sunday, February 19, 2012

Building the bridge without mass transit just doesn't make sense. True most people now drive but that's because it's so inconvenient to take metro north. You either have to take a bus or a ferry to Tarrytown to catch a train. Putting mass transit on the bridge would allow for residents of Orange and Rockland to get on a train and not get off until they got to Grand Central Station. We know that the population on the west side of the Hudson is growing and not preparing for it will only result in more traffic, more traffic jams and more time for the comuters. This one time, I think we should look at the future and prepare for it.

Reply

Leo Wiegman

3:55 pm on Sunday, February 19, 2012

According to the 2010 US Census, Orange and Rockland Counties are fastest growing area in the entire state. Rockland grew from 287,000 in 2000 to 312,000 in 2011 (8.7%). Orange is growing even slightly faster (from 341,000 in 2000 to 373,000 in 2010 (9.2%). Westchester grew only 2.8% from 923,000 in 2000 to 949,000 in 2010. So, just taking into account population growth west of the Hudson. it would seem prudent to put more people into public transit or face even more crowded roadways.

Reply

Dan Thaler

5:28 pm on Sunday, February 19, 2012

And if gas prices take a permanent jump folks will be looking for options to driving.

Reply

Adrian Berezowsky

10:00 pm on Sunday, February 19, 2012

Mr. Wiegman,

Excellent article and I agree in theory 100 percent. Unfortunately, I think that we need to be realistic in terms of our expectations and, more importantly, our efforts. At this point, it does not seem that there is anything we can do to add mass transit to the proposed design. It simply will not happen within the current buget that has been fastracked by Obama.

However, we CAN demand that the proposed design truly incorporates mass transit as not only an OPTION but as part of the actual design. This would at the very least make it possible and realistic to add mass transit in the future as opposed to the current pipe dream which is being fed to the public and the media of
"not precluding mass transit...."

Reply

Leo Wiegman

10:36 pm on Monday, February 20, 2012

@Adrian Berezowsky: I agree, the next best outcome to a new bridge with public transit built in upfront would be a new bridge that was designed to include public transit--like Bus Rapid Transit--or as you put itwell--does not preclude BRT.

Reply

Mike S

11:50 pm on Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Yes, If a new bridge is built, it should be built with mass transit in mind. If it isn't included in the initial project, it should be designed with the ability to add the transit at a later time. At the very least, a railway to the Tarrytown station would help out.

Reply

Leave a comment