Cuomo in Piermont: 'New TZ Bridge a Step Closer to Reality'

Local officials support push for federal funding

said Monday afternoon in Piermont that New York State is now closer to replacing the current Tappan Zee Bridge with a .

The governor's announcement came hours after a unanimous vote by the New York Metropolitan Transportation Council (NYMTC) to officially incorporate the project into the council's plan.

"Today we are one step closer to building a new, safer bridge that will revitalize the Hudson Valley by creating thousands of jobs," Cuomo said at the 1 p.m. gathering in Flywheel Park.

More than 100 residents and local, state and federal lawmakers gathered downtown, overlooking the Tappan Zee Bridge to the north and local marinas.

After a brief speech, Cuomo signed a letter to U.S. Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood, applying for billions of dollars in TIFIA federal loans to help finance the new span.

"The next step is going to Washington to get funding, so we can build the bridge and make tolls affordable," Cuomo said. "After over a decade of delay caused by political dysfunction, this letter demonstrates that we are making real progress towards constructing a stronger, transit ready bridge."

When asked what financing would be in place should the state be declined federal funds, Cuomo was terse.

"I'm an optimist," he said. "They're going to say yes."

Cuomo noted the importance of mass transit, a component local residents and officials .

"The future of transit isn't people getting into cars and driving," Cuomo said. "It's mass transit. Period."

The new span is during rush hour.

The governor the in 2017 as excessive, but did not cite a specific figure that he would like to see—he only advocated a decrease.

Cuomo said the sluggish push to build a new bridge over the past 13 years has been time—and taxpayer money—squandered.

"We decided to waste millions," he said. "We decided to put people through traffic and congestion and pollution. It was a failure of leadership, a failure of government."

NYMTC member and Rockland County executive C. Scott Vanderhoef voted alongside others this morning. Late last week, Vanderhoef and lawmakers from Westchester and Putnam counties

Vanderhoef said he is pleased to support the project on the heels of Cuomo's assurances that the new bridge is to include mass transit capabilities.

"The governor should be given great credit for making it transit compatible," Vanderhoef said. "I am very pleased to be supportive." 

Vanderhoef also said the federal government should assist New York with the financing of the new bridge connecting Westchester and Rockland. 

"This new bridge will be safer for our drivers and built to last, and include a dedicated bus lane on day one," said assemblyman Ellen Jaffee, D-Suffern. "It will be a major economic driver for communities across the region, creating approximately 45,000 jobs."

Cuomo said the state expects to hear back about federal funding in the coming months.

sayitsnotsojack August 22, 2012 at 12:02 PM
Why is it the Brooklyn Bridge was completed in 1883 and is still standing, the Tap was completed in 1955 and is about to fall into the river. Too bad the people who built the Brooklyn Bridge didn't build the Tappan Zee so we would not have to be spending the billions of taxes to build a new bridge.
Voice of Reason August 22, 2012 at 12:36 PM
Also, where are these busses going to go when they get to the other side of the bridge?? It's a one lane road with traffic lights and then down a big hill to get to the train station. A dedicated bus lane will get them over the bridge quickly, but they are going to sit in traffic on the one lane road in tarrytown anyway. So what's the benifit of the bus lane??? Is that the argument of why we need a new bridge other than 4 pile-ons that might need replacement in the way distant future, which by the way can be replaced for much less than a new bridge. Remember, the new deck is almost finished on the old bridge, so it's almost a new bridge now anyway
Heron August 22, 2012 at 01:53 PM
The argument in favor of a bus lane is that, if a bus can get across the bridge faster than a car, and if it costs much less than driving and parking, the bus becomes an attractive alternative and more people would take the bus. This is much better for the environment, and it would reduce the enormous amount of street-clogging, polluting cars going over the bridge.
Walt August 22, 2012 at 02:12 PM
If a rail line was included on the bridge, people would get on a train in Rockland County and get off in Grand Central Station which would be cheaper, faster, cause less "street clogging" by polluting buses and offer a far more efficient and attractive option to commuters than a dedicated bus lane that still requires driving through local traffic to get to a train station.
Heron August 22, 2012 at 02:19 PM
I completely agree with you Walt. I would love to see a rail line on the bridge. A bus lane was offered as a compromise to those who wanted some kind of mass transit on the bridge. I am in favor of a bus lane, as opposed to no mass transit, but would greatly prefer a rail line.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »