.
Feedback

Feud Reignited Over GM Property

Tarrytown will reopen a lawsuit challenging Sleepy Hollow's environmental impact assessment of the proposed GM development.

After a lull in lawsuits between Tarrytown and Sleepy Hollow, both villages will head back to court soon.

On Monday night, the Board of Trustees for the Village of Tarrytown unanimously voted to reopen a lawsuit challenging Sleepy Hollow over the proposed General Motors development.

Tarrytown is challenging Sleepy Hollow over the traffic impact of the proposed development and the perceived lack of traffic mitigation plans.

"The primary concerns are traffic," said Village Administrator Michael Blau. "The board has come to the conclusion that the impacts have not been addressed.... Sleepy Hollow has decided to move ahead without addressing Tarrytown's concerns. 

Sleepy Hollow trustees deemed traffic concerns a non-issue, and that mitigation plans were adequate, when they passed their environmental impact findings i (click link for documents). Sleepy Hollow Trustees agreed that the proposed GM development, which includes 1,177 residential units, "is one which minimizes or avoids adverse environmental effects to the maximum extent practical."

Tarrytown's lawsuit will be practically identical to a previous lawsuit filed in June 2007 over the GM/Roseland development. 

In that lawsuit, Tarrytown took issue with traffic impacts, lack of traffic mitigation measures, and the overall size of the development – the village was pushing for a reduction in density to 800 residential units at the GM site. 

Sleepy Hollow trustees in the past have said that traffic studies have already been conducted. Sleepy Hollow is also interested in pursuing a connection to the GM property via Continental Street, in the hopes of funneling traffic north to Route 117 to alleviate some vehicular stress on Tarrtown. 

On Monday, Tarrytown Trustees agreed to hire the law firm Silverberg & Zalantis to represent the village in their disagreement with Sleepy Hollow. It is the same law firm that represented the village in 2007. That court case was ultimately ended because the proposed development with Roseland fell through.  

However, the village will not be re-opening that old case, but will file an entirely new complaint to respond to the most recent incarnation of the proposed development at the GM site in Sleepy Hollow. 

"It's a new lawsuit, but the same issues weren't resolved,"  said Village Attorney Jeffrey Schumejda. "It went to court, the lawsuits were filed and then it was put on hold."

Schumejda said that after both sides submit all documentation, and have a chance to respond, the court would issue a decision on the matter within 60 days. 

Blau said he would be in contact with Sleepy Hollow's Village administration to let them know that the lawsuit is being revived. 

"I'll be informing them of the action tomorrow (Tuesday) morning," Blau said 

Roony May 17, 2011 at 06:06 pm
Lora, what specifically makes you think this won't INCREASE your taxes? How many $1 million "whoops, didn't think of that" items do you think will crop up? It's not going to be zero.
ASleepyBoy May 17, 2011 at 06:14 pm
Not only treehuggers enjoy parks. But parks are not going to bring in appreciable amount of money......
Robert Solari May 17, 2011 at 10:18 pm
Its time that all Sleepy Hollow residents start to BOYCOTT doing business in Tarrytown.
Mike May 17, 2011 at 11:55 pm
I think tarrytown should make the street down by the H-bridge one way, just to cut down on traffic in that area. And nobody cares about SH boycotting tarrytown, maybe thay should stop using rt 9 also. SH is nothing without tarrytown, except maybe SH could stand for another acronym. Just look at whats been happening with their Fire, Ambulance and police lately. Get your own schools, we'd all be better off. Except for SH, that is.
ASleepyBoy May 18, 2011 at 12:35 am
Mike, while I think your idea regarding making the the H bridge one way is interesting, your attitude is exactly why this entire development is so heated, contested and will undoubtedly fail. Our villages should be developing their riverfronts together rather than expending countless and needless resources of their own individually.
Mike May 18, 2011 at 01:01 am
Agreed, but I didn't think it was fair to suggest a boycott. Fact is, SH doesn't seem to be able to keep its house in order, and adding another 5000 residents doesn't seem to be the answer. Yes, it will increase tax revenues, but nobody's talking about how much this development will tax our infrastructure. I, for one, dont think doubling the population of our town will be a good thing. Maybe for people who own a nice little business on Beekman, but not for me, who only owns a nice little house in a neighborhood that will turn ugly once the development is here.
Robert Solari May 18, 2011 at 03:14 am
Why should Sleepy Hollow Residents shop in Tarrytown? I'm going to personal spend up to $1,000.00 on signage to promote the BOYCOTT. Sleepy Hollow residents will unite and stick together you watch!
Roony May 18, 2011 at 11:35 am
Wow, I hope you're getting a fat check from GM...
Robert Solari May 18, 2011 at 02:02 pm
No I'm fighting for Sleepy Hollow!
ASleepyBoy May 18, 2011 at 02:22 pm
Agreed on all fronts.
Spencer Benedict May 18, 2011 at 02:27 pm
It sounds like Tarrytown doesn't have a problem with traffic as they develop their waterfront, only when the Sleepy Hollow development appears as competition. It is no secret that they are having trouble moving those units on the waterfront. Could it be that Tarrytown is using this lawsuit to hamper the competition? Disgraceful.
Tarrytowner and Proud Of It May 18, 2011 at 03:29 pm
Mr Solari I gather you are a carpet bagger well let me give you a little history North Tarrytown which is what sleepy hollow is has always been the red headed step child to Tarrytown whenever GM was in the news it was in Tarrytown that always drove NT nuts remember a boycott works both ways why don't you run for office and make things better I love people like yu that compalin but don't fix the problem .Also if you boycott and anyone passes away are you going to bury them in their backyards since you cant use COFFEY AND DWYERS do to your boycott. The solution is the 2 towns working together like they used to when Bill Basher and Ray Mcgovern and Ray Calore were on the board a guy like MIke Hyland Frank Rey etc lets stop the childish behavior believe it or not we are stuck with each other
Tarrytowner and Proud Of It May 18, 2011 at 03:49 pm
One more thing why deprieve 100's of North Tarrytowners the enjoyment of going to the Warner Library
ASleepyBoy May 18, 2011 at 04:07 pm
Tarrytowner and Proud Of It, although I do not appreciate your initial debasing of Sleepy Hollow, I fully agree that the solution is to have the two villages work together. Hopefully combining more services will be a step in the right direction....
Tarrytowner and Proud Of It May 18, 2011 at 04:22 pm
I agree Sleepy Boy
Willie Lester May 18, 2011 at 05:12 pm
They can build all they want on the GM site, no one will buy them for the simple reason you have to go down Beekman Ave to get to them. If I'm spending that type of money I need to be very happy driving in and out of it. Unless beekman is cleaned up it's not going to work. Thats why most of the people in Sleepy Hollow spend thier money in Tarrytown. Robert, you can call for a boycott all you want. Never going to happen. Sorry. Where are they going to shop? What services does beekman ave hafe to offer? Grocery store? Icecream store? CVS? Wallgreens?Payhalf? Musica Hall? No,no,no,,no,no and no.
Willie Lester May 18, 2011 at 05:16 pm
Robert, why don't you donate your $1000.00 to something more worthy. I'm sure Sleepy Hollow has a beautification fund some where.
Robert Solari May 18, 2011 at 09:33 pm
Well we have the cemetery so where will you get buried Proud of it? We can always get waked in Ossining or Briarcliff! Let's put all kidding aside! We all know that most of the residents of Sleepy Hollow shop in Tarrytown. If our residents no longer want to support your local shops its up to them to decide. It might be a silent Boycott with out signs who knows. But I know its time for all Sleepy Hollow Residents to unite and support there town. P.s. our gasoline is cheaper!
Jamesina Shields May 18, 2011 at 11:37 pm
Time for the officials of Sleepy Hollow to get their act together. They knew perfectly well what Tarrytown's concerns were ignored them and proceeded as if they didn't matter.
The reason the Village of Sleepy Hollow always ends up paying thousands of tax payer dollars to lawyers to defend them in court in every area of endeavor is that they do not act in good faith. Recall petition anyone.
glen May 19, 2011 at 12:07 am
Willie, you couldn't be more right about beekman ave. I have lived here for 20 years and have watched our "main street" turn into an embarrassment. Our town leaders should be ashamed of what they have let happen to beekman. Who is going to come to the GM development when the only way to get there is over the H bridge (past DPW and the oil depot) or down beekman ( approaching third world run down appearance)? There are zero shopping and service opportunities to lure people to sleepy hollow or keep them here. The few businesses that are trying to make it on beekman are doing so with no help from the local govt. And Robert - spend the thousand dollars in the restaurants on beekman. And lastly, Jasmina, if we had a village attorney that knew as much about law as she does about shady backroom politics this town wouldn't spend so much in legal fees. If she had any clue about law she would be in private practice. Oops- I forgot, she couldn't handle private practice
unclesam May 19, 2011 at 03:22 am
I agree Beekman Avenue has turned into a slum! When GM was working 2 shifts full steam, there were 2,000 workers a day driving up and down Beekman and Central Ave. morning and night. What is Tarrytown talking about to much traffic?! Maybe Drew wasn't around town when that happened?
Bjorn Olsson May 19, 2011 at 08:35 am
Since SH and Tarrytown seem to be joined at the hip anyway, wouldn't it be better to just merge them?
Tarrytowner and Proud Of It May 19, 2011 at 09:21 pm
YOU HAVE A BETTER CHANCE OF SEEING GOD just look at the controversy here on this one topic also it will be difficult because Tarrytown is in teh town of Greenburgh and North Tarrytown is in Mount Pleasnt for one problem.Try figuring out who will be police chief fire chief etc it wont happen in our lifetime
Bjorn Olsson May 19, 2011 at 09:31 pm
I have heard suggestion to create a new town to contain the two villages. and maybe rename Tarrytown South Sleepy Hollow :-)
Combining services is already under way from what I understand, so it can't be completely impossible. In any case, may not matter, since judgement day will apparently occur 6pm on Saturday, so maybe we'll have a very real chance to see god. After that, combining the villages should be a piece of cake.
Tarrytowner and Proud Of It May 19, 2011 at 09:38 pm
Lets hear from the people from NT about the name
Artie Mund May 20, 2011 at 12:25 pm
his is a complete waste of money. Look why don't these two towns sit down and try to work out something between them. There is never going to be a perfect solution to this traffic problem because of the location of the old GM plant it on the water at the end of Beekman ave there are two ways in down Beekman ave and over the H bridge into tarrytown. This is a problem that goes back to the days when the plant was running!
There was always talk of building a roadway along the river to the thruway ect. Forget it that's not happening. Sooner or later that property is going to have to be developed.her is the real problem part time politicians they are not that bright and are often influenced by short sighted people. The village of Sleepy hollow was mis managed for many years back in the late 60's and 70's the fire department ran the town and politicians worked to keep the property taxes low so, by doing that they kept taxes low by raising General motors taxes and actually lowering village taxes! finally General motors smartened up and sued and left and Sleepy hollow became the dump that it is. the older residents now had to make up the taxe loss for the finacial wizards and thieves of the 70's and 80's this opened up tons of property to slumloards and most of your business and apartments became rooming houses for dirtbags and undesireables that's why sleepy hollow is having trouble rebilding today.
Artie Mund May 20, 2011 at 12:30 pm
Also this goes back forever realestate agents back in the day would bring prospective buyers in the manors to pleasantville for shopping Beekman ave was never a 5th avenue! lol Tarrytown should be happy that the development of this property will bring tons of yups to Main st. the traffic problen has always been there Tarrytown has done nothing to improve that over the years. As far as merging another idea that has been tossed around it will never happen why would tarrytown want to take on this unwanted step child Sleepy hollow? there's really nothing to offer except problems but both towns should seriously look at the future cost of police and fire and other departments eventually these towns will not be able to afford them. but as usual they will let the future politicians worry about that as long as thier property taxes are affordable for them right now.
Robert Solari May 20, 2011 at 02:47 pm
Nicely said Artie!
Wade Schultz May 20, 2011 at 10:31 pm
Great points Artie!
Aintthatascam July 12, 2011 at 03:22 pm
Wait until the people in Philipse manor and Sleepy Hollow Manor start pulling out. Houses will sell for 30% less than what they were bought for thus, creating less tax revenues.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Tarrytown-Sleepy Hollow Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Lisa Buchman (Editor) June 6, 2013 at 02:46 pm
Great title for your blog! And cute kids :-) You are welcome to share your blog on Patch if youRead More like - you own the content and can post entries on the site. You can also get subscribers there too! Just click on Start blogging from the home page to get started.