.
Feedback

Mayor Assails Tarrytown Appeal of GM Case

Citing Sleepy Hollow's 'unequivocal win' in Lighthouse Landing suit, Wray sees 'waste of resources.'

Tarrytown is only wasting taxpayers' money—in two villages—by appealing its “unequivocal” loss in the Lighthouse Landing court case, Sleepy Hollow Mayor Ken Wray contends.

“I would hope that they would have the sense to step back and re-read the judge’s decision,” the mayor said at the Board of Trustees meeting this week. He made his remarks after Tarrytown officials, citing a wish to preserve their options, served notice that they intend to seek a review of last month’s state Supreme Court decision.

That ruling, by Justice James Hubert, had been seen as ending a five-year court fight over plans to turn 96 riverside acres—the onetime General Motors minivan site—into an $800 million mixed-use complex of residential retail, office and recreation development.

Instead, Tarrytown filed a notice of appeal Tuesday, saying it wants assurances that Sleepy Hollow will “commit sufficient funds” to manage expected traffic congestion. At the same time, however, Tarrytown Administrator Mike Blau said in a statement, “the village does not have to pursue the appeal.”

Blau wants to know, among other things, how much of “$11.5 million in funds Sleepy Hollow is requiring from the developer is to be used to mitigate the traffic impacts in Tarrytown.” 

For his part, Sleepy Hollow’s mayor, in a statement, succinctly summed up the court’s decision as “we won, they lost.” In his remarks Tuesday, Wray called it “a resounding, straightforward and very unequivocal win for us.”

“After wasting well over $100,000 of taxpayer funds on a frivolous lawsuit,” Wray said, “Tarrytown is now indicating that they're willing to waste hundreds of thousands more of taxpayer dollars on what will be a fruitless and costly appeal.”

(The costs so far amount to $163,756.11, Patch has learned. You can examine the figures here.)

He told the trustees that “after so clearly losing,” Tarrytown was “going forward... with nothing in the way of a legal argument to sustain a valid appeal.”

Wray called the move “nothing but a waste of resources for both villages and is nothing more than either a delaying tactic or an attempt to...make us go away.”

Blau, in his statement, held out hope for a non-judicial resolution of the dispute, suggesting that if “Sleepy Hollow will commit sufficient funds to address the impacts in Tarrytown of the development project... it will not be necessary for Tarrytown to proceed with the appeal.”

Follow Patch for continuing updates on this story.

Like us on Facebook  |  Follow us on Twitter  |  Sign up for our newsletter

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Tarrytown-Sleepy Hollow Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Julia Costa takes a shot on goal against North Salem
Krista Madsen (Editor) May 22, 2013 at 08:19 am
Hurray Mustangs!
Krista Madsen (Editor) May 21, 2013 at 10:37 pm
Quirk of our new system: for anyone posting just press hard returns twice to make paragraph breaks.Read More Thanks for posting this Mike! Great video!!
Stephanie Segarra May 20, 2013 at 04:56 pm
it happens all over..even whole food! check every date!!!!!!!
Krista Madsen (Editor) May 20, 2013 at 10:42 am
Has this happened to others? black juice...ewww! Thanks for writing.
medibeads@gmail.com
Krista Madsen (Editor) May 20, 2013 at 10:44 am
Thanks Blanca for posting. Again contact: medibeads@gmail.com if you want to hear more about gettingRead More a beading party hosted by Blanca Medina. Here's more on her on Patch: http://tarrytown.patch.com/groups/around-town/p/would-you-like-to-learn-how-to-do-this
Krista Madsen (Editor) May 18, 2013 at 02:50 pm
sounds like great stuff, thanks for posting!
Peter Neidell May 18, 2013 at 08:48 am
PLEASE NOTE CHANGE TO ABOVE: Sale is Sunday only- 10 am-3 pm thanks!
Heron May 20, 2013 at 06:28 pm
A big part of the problem is that the teachers' expectations about what supplies are necessary haveRead More become so extreme. When my kids were in school in Tarrytown, we would get a list at the beginning of every school year of the supplies we needed to buy. The parents were asked to buy a separate looseleaf binder for every single class our kids were taking and, for some classes, they asked for a looseleaf AND a spiral notebook. When I was in school, each kid had ONE looseleaf and we separated classes with dividers. Having SIX or seven loose leafs adds to backpack weight and costs a lot of money. My kids supply bills were often close to $100 apiece. The teachers have bought into this idea that all of these supplies are necessary and they are not. I'm not surprised that Staples is offering "rewards programs." Their advertising and marketing efforts have convinced the teachers that you must have a package of 12 red correcting pens, per child.