.
Feedback

Tarrytown May Appeal GM Case Dismissal

The Village of Tarrytown announces a notice of appeal that they may or may not pursue further; Sleepy Hollow Mayor Ken Wray denounces the waste of taxpayer money.

On Tuesday, Tarrytown officials announced they had filed a notice of appeal to the recent Supreme Court decision to dismiss their lawsuit against Sleepy Hollow over the GM development.

This came with the caveat that they hoped they wouldn't have to follow through on pursuing court action. And this was followed by anger from the neighboring village.

Administrator Mike Blau issued this release:

The Village of Tarrytown has never opposed development of the former General Motors site in the Village of Sleepy Hollow.  An action was filed by the Village of Tarrytown because our reading of the decisions and findings issued by the Sleepy Hollow Board of Trustees led us to believe that, while Sleepy Hollow recognized the development would adversely impact traffic in Tarrytown, there were no appropriate or adequate provisions for addressing those impacts in Tarrytown. The Village therefore commenced a challenge to the Sleepy Hollow approvals in order to protect the citizens and businesses of Tarrytown.

[On Oct. 2] the Village filed a notice of appeal of the decision of the State Supreme Court in order to preserve Tarrytown’s options. The Village does not have to pursue the appeal and it is our hope that it will not be necessary. The findings of the Judge concluded that part of the $11.5 million in funds Sleepy Hollow is requiring from the developer is to be used to mitigate the traffic impacts in Tarrytown. While we did not interpret the Sleepy Hollow decision as making such a provision, simultaneously with the Village’s notice of appeal, we are reaching out to Sleepy Hollow to determine how much of those funds are actually available for traffic mitigation in Tarrytown. The Village is hopeful that the Judge’s reading of the Sleepy Hollow findings was correct and that Sleepy Hollow will commit sufficient funds to address the impacts in Tarrytown of the development project at the General Motors site and that it will not be necessary for Tarrytown to proceed with the appeal.

Sleepy Hollow Mayor Ken Wray responded in turn with this statement: 

The Supreme Court's decision was clear and unambiguous: we won, they lost. After wasting well over $100,000 of taxpayer funds on a frivolous lawsuit, Tarrytown is now indicating that they're willing to waste hundreds of thousands more of taxpayer dollars on what will be a fruitless and costly appeal. Tarrytown refuses to acknowledge that the process was thorough and legal, as now confirmed by two separate Supreme Court decisions that favored Sleepy Hollow.

Follow Patch as this story develops.

Like us on Facebook  |  Follow us on Twitter  |  Sign up for our newsletter

Where do you stand on this divide between Tarrytown and Sleepy Hollow over the GM development? Is Tarrytown standing in the way of progress or do they have a legitimate claim over traffic impacts? Weigh in below.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Tarrytown-Sleepy Hollow Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Julia Costa takes a shot on goal against North Salem
Krista Madsen (Editor) May 22, 2013 at 08:19 am
Hurray Mustangs!
Krista Madsen (Editor) May 21, 2013 at 10:37 pm
Quirk of our new system: for anyone posting just press hard returns twice to make paragraph breaks.Read More Thanks for posting this Mike! Great video!!
Stephanie Segarra May 20, 2013 at 04:56 pm
it happens all over..even whole food! check every date!!!!!!!
Krista Madsen (Editor) May 20, 2013 at 10:42 am
Has this happened to others? black juice...ewww! Thanks for writing.
medibeads@gmail.com
Krista Madsen (Editor) May 20, 2013 at 10:44 am
Thanks Blanca for posting. Again contact: medibeads@gmail.com if you want to hear more about gettingRead More a beading party hosted by Blanca Medina. Here's more on her on Patch: http://tarrytown.patch.com/groups/around-town/p/would-you-like-to-learn-how-to-do-this
Krista Madsen (Editor) May 18, 2013 at 02:50 pm
sounds like great stuff, thanks for posting!
Peter Neidell May 18, 2013 at 08:48 am
PLEASE NOTE CHANGE TO ABOVE: Sale is Sunday only- 10 am-3 pm thanks!
Heron May 20, 2013 at 06:28 pm
A big part of the problem is that the teachers' expectations about what supplies are necessary haveRead More become so extreme. When my kids were in school in Tarrytown, we would get a list at the beginning of every school year of the supplies we needed to buy. The parents were asked to buy a separate looseleaf binder for every single class our kids were taking and, for some classes, they asked for a looseleaf AND a spiral notebook. When I was in school, each kid had ONE looseleaf and we separated classes with dividers. Having SIX or seven loose leafs adds to backpack weight and costs a lot of money. My kids supply bills were often close to $100 apiece. The teachers have bought into this idea that all of these supplies are necessary and they are not. I'm not surprised that Staples is offering "rewards programs." Their advertising and marketing efforts have convinced the teachers that you must have a package of 12 red correcting pens, per child.